道 Dao Knowledge Base

Baopuzi (The Master Who Embraces the Uncarved Block)

The Baopuzi 抱朴子 by Ge Hong: the fourth-century encyclopedia of Daoist practice — the source of this site's taixi definition and its economy-argument for guarding the One.

中文: 抱朴子 · Bàopǔzǐ · Eastern Jin (composed c. 314–320s CE) · Ge Hong 葛洪 (283–343/363)

PRIMARY SOURCEHISTORICAL EVIDENCE

What the book is

The Baopuzi — titled from its author’s self-chosen name, “the Master Who Embraces the Uncarved Block” (抱朴守质: holding to simplicity, guarding the unadorned) — is the fourth century’s great consolidation of Daoist practice knowledge. Ge Hong composed it in two halves with deliberately different registers:

Why it matters for sitting practice

Three reasons:

  1. It is the earliest encyclopedia of the practices themselves. Before the Baopuzi, the sitting and breathing methods this site covers are scattered in sayings and dialogues; after it, they are a catalog — numbered, compared, ranked. The book marks the tradition’s transition from aphorism to curriculum.
  2. It is honest about its own limits. Ge Hong repeatedly distinguishes what he has practiced from what he has heard, and notes that the essentials are secret, oral, and cannot be written. A knowledge base built on documented text should respect a source that documented what it could not write.
  3. It argues economy. The Dizhen chapter’s “one method instead of thousands” is the tradition’s own principle of parsimony — and the warrant for this site’s focus on a small set of core practices rather than the full visualization library.

The dating and text, stated plainly

The received text descends from a Song-era collation (the Siku Quanshu editors record the chaotic count discrepancies across all prior bibliographies — inner chapters counted at 20, 21, or 10 juan in different catalogs; outer at 50, 51, 52, 30, or 20). This page uses the received numbering: inner 20, outer 52, with the author’s own count (50) noted. The chapters this site quotes — Shizhi and Dizhen — are intact and multiply attested. The book is not scripture in the devotional sense; it is one practitioner-scholar’s compilation, and this site treats it as such: a witness, not a canon.

Uncertainty preserved: juan numbering varies across the tradition’s bibliographies; Ge Hong’s authorship of the inner chapters is secure, the fine transmission details are documented as imperfect.

Its composition date is pinned at Baopuzi Composed (c. 314–320s CE).

Sources